Kevin Strom is a child molester

In 2008, Kevin Strom was sentenced to 23 months in prison for having child pornographic pictures on his computer. He was also being looked into for stalking a young girl. Not only was this girl underage, she was Asian. Strom is not only a sexual deviant, he is a race-mixer. One would think this would have been enough to destroy his comeback to our white movement. It wasn’t.

 

Strom, and a few others are ‘rebranding’ the National Alliance. He managed to find two men almost as mentally unstable as himself. One is David Pringle. An out of shape loser that has odd fetishes for guns. The other is Will Williams, a man who beats women. At least the women he beats are of age. Strom prefers his to be 10-11, and Asian.

 

Websites such as Stormfront have showcased Strom as a “hero” or “brains” of the movement. Apparently his brains didn’t teach him common sense. Such as never downloading pictures of eight-year-olds on your computer. What has Strom ever done? He is a welfare queen. He has made his living off of white people like you and I. I worked my whole life. Manual labor. Strom spent his time living off of the National Alliance. He used your donations to stalk young girls.

 

Strom should have gotten 5-10 years in prison. Like a sissy, he took a plea bargain. He admitted he jacks-off to kiddie porn to avoid a longer sentence. The man is a disgrace. He is nothing more than a bum who leeches off of hardworking white patriots. He’s also a sick pervert. Too bad he wasn’t killed while in prison.

 

If any of our members are caught supporting Strom, they will be banished. No questions asked. We do not tolerate child molesters. We also don’t tolerate welfare queens. Strom is both.

 

 

Advertisements

Interracial crime – the facts

NCFS Table

This table can be used for a number of interesting calculations. First, we find that during the 2012/2013 period, blacks committed an average of 560,600 violent crimes against whites, whereas whites committed only 99,403 such crimes against blacks. This means blacks were the attackers in 84.9 percent of the violent crimes involving blacks and whites. This figure is consistent with reports from 2008, the last year DOJ released similar statistics. Perhaps not coincidentally, that was the year Mr. Obama was elected president.

Interestingly, we find that violent interracial crime involving blacks and Hispanics occurs in almost exactly the same proportions as black/white crime: Blacks are the attackers 82.5 percent of the time, while Hispanics are attackers only 17.5 percent of the time.

Some observers argue that what causes the overwhelming preponderance of black-on-white over white-on-black violence is “chance of encounter,” due to the fact that there are five times as many whites as blacks in the American population. However, there are only about 30 percent more Hispanics than blacks, yet black-on-Hispanic violence is almost as lopsided as black-on-white violence. This suggests blacks may be deliberately targeting both whites and Hispanics.

Using figures for the 2013 racial mix of the population–62.2 percent white, 17.1 percent Hispanic, 13.2 percent black–we can calculate the average likelihood of a person of each race attacking the other. A black is 27 times more likely to attack a white and 8 times more likely to attack a Hispanic than the other way around. A Hispanic is eight times more likely to attack a white than vice versa.

We can also calculate how often criminals of each group choose victims of other races. As indicated below, when whites commit violence they choose fellow whites as victims 82.4 percent of the time, and almost never attack blacks. Blacks attack whites almost as often as they attack blacks, and Hispanics attack whites more often than they attack any other group, including their own.

Click here for full article.